Crushing Defeat For the Perverts

Too much stupid, not enough time...

If you care to read all the madness

that comes with arguing with misogynists online, feel free to click it and search it out. But it's simply more of the same, oh-so-very-typical pro-birth/anti-choice rhetoric with a dashes of vitriol tossed into the selective listening, acting poorly and crying foul when it's mirrored, all stemming from a solid hate-on for the ladies. 

The conversation starts, somewhere, earlier this afternoon, on Twitter, with a link to an article that was probably the best "Pro-Birth/Anti-Choice" propaganda I had ever consumed, and I quite agree with the sentiment expressed on the first page though I did only read a few paragraphs. 

Skimmed. I skimmed it, I'll be honest there. Leisurely reading is for leisurely pass times. And so, especially when consuming material that makes me feel horrible to be a human being alongside so many others, I prefer to spend the least amount of time possible while gathering that kind of information. I'd almost guarantee you don't have the stomach for half of the shit I have heard and read in this lifetime. I don't have the stomach to be a doctor, we all suck in our own ways.

What? Am I only supposed to read propaganda that I agree with? Well, that'd be kind of silly, wouldn't it? How do you know which team/s you side with if you don't access all of the rule books? And then run the facts through your own little processor, known as your brain, to determine your feelings and pursuant opinions about any given matter? The only other possibility is if you've blind faith in whoever you are repeating... that gets a bit dangerous and we can all think of at least two instances in History that might not have been so tragic if a bitch had simply thought for himself a second or two before running out with guns blazing, that illustrate the dangers in blind acceptance.

Y'see, I might very well've ended up on the Pro-Life side of the debate if they could make a reasonable argument for their regurgitations but the argument inevitably boils down to "Ya? Well, you're a sinner!" and/or "Ya? Well, you write porn!" and/or "Ya? Well, you have impeccable cleavage as your profile picture" or something else equally unimportant, as it pertains to one's ability to engage in critical thinking, every time. Should I have said "every damned time" to infer the frequent participation of the God Fearers in these role-plays? I don't give a shit what you subscribe to if you're not a dumbass. I think at least two of my posts make that perfectly clear.

For one, your labels are your own, I don't subscribe to any of it. Clearly,  I don't produce any visual graphics here. Yes, plenty of screenshots and the occasional hyper close-up of a titty with a real raspberry nipple protector but I don't even write screenplays for pornographic films. Yet. 

For the record, I would, if a bitch'd pay me for it. Writing is writing, and any creative writing is still better than composing English instructions for products made in China. But I take those jobs, too. Writing is writing. It's what I do. 

I have no problems with people who have sex to make a living. I think the abundant hooker talk makes that perfectly clear. That's kinda where that Pro-Choice thing comes in again. That idea that, regardless of what it is or isn't, you can do what you do, and I can do what I do and they don't have to be the same thing to be Okay for each of us, respectively. You probably like to fuck chicks exclusively, I just don't. But neither of those opinions makes either of us wrong, it's just means we are aware of preferences.

But mostly I bitch about how easy it is to not be a total dumbass and how hard it is for me to understand why people don't choose it more often. The silver lining on that cloud is that it really does work out, smashingly, for those who are worth my time, because they truly do glimmer like an oasis in the dessert by comparison, just for being themselves. So much love for all you, Fuckers!!

The beauty of these kinds of "you people" engagements on Twitter is that it's an open billboard, where any and all, can and do, engage. Whereas Facebook is closed off to your friends only, or friends of friends, Twitter is a Universal fucking free for all. The whole world wide web, right thar in front o' ya. Still, people take issue with others interjecting in their public conversations. The thing is, it's Twitter and you're not at a coffeehouse shooting the shit a little too loudly with your bestie, so use the direct message option if it's private... Anyway, taking the time call a dumbass a dumbass often brings other smartasses out of the woodwork of this grand billboard. Connections are made, the global community grows, all is well in the land of cyber. Giggity.

Speaking of giggity, I don't have to explain what the implications of revoking the rights of some citizens says about the security of all other citizens' rights, do I? How the implications of limiting access for certain people to certain medical procedures that save lives, or at very least improve their quality, is pure discrimination and if they'd tabled a motion for a committee to determine that the African descendants were actually better off when they were owned by white slavers, there's no way it would have gone through. That if it were a question of restricting what you could do with your baby batter, when, with whom... Who are we kidding here, there's no way Ball Rights would ever come under attack. 

As a writing exercise Twitter is a pretty fun game overall!

Most of all, I definitely don't have to explain the inherent connection between Motion 312 and how a woman's right to choose what goes on with her body is somewhat critical to you scoring the opportunity to wear her sweet booty as a hat, do I? Because if she doesn't choose you, it's rape. We all know that much by now, right?

Pro-Choice is not pro-abortion, it is simply Pro-Choice, regardless of whatever other ideas your filters project onto the very simple term: Choice. Whether that choice is what you eat for breakfast, who you fuck or when, where you live and work, whether you're a parent or not, if you smoke or don't, drink pineapple juice or mango or none at all. Your body, your choice. My body, my choice. 

If you allow the dependents in your home to dictate all decisions, you need to gain a better understanding of who is the leader in parent/guardian and child relations. It's the adult(s)'s choice to make the best guess based on all known data. If a person decides that terminating a pregnancy is the best thing for all involved, that is their choice. You chose to have kids and teach them your bigotry and I'm guessing you wouldn't like it if somebody came in and told you what would be best for them, even if it was the truth.

It's straight up egomania that makes a person think they know what is best for anyone else. This obsessive fear of the almighty power of the vagina is a cruel bitch mistress for far too many folks out there. Vaginas do give nice hugs but it ain't all scary powerful like they make it out to be. I sincerely hope that someday they do realize vaginas don't actually have teeth.


This "gent" lists "critical thinking" as one of his pursuits. I believe, based on my experience of the fellow, that that is flagrantly false advertising. I also believe I should have followed my own advice and read his profile before going on so long smashing my face about a brick wall that has been decorated with chain linked barbed wire, while I was high and on Twitter. He's my first block, I just couldn't handle anymore stupidity or manipulation, but it truly makes me feel the almighty power of my vagina, exercised through my fingers, with a few clicks of a mouse... clickity, clickity, Bitches!

@lettingsmokeout Do you know what boundaries are? Are you the type to accost women who walk alone at night, too? Read the blog
— Imma Writa (@ImmaWrita) September 26, 2012 

^Click a link, and search it out, if you're dying to see me having resorted to "Pls, just STFU" and maybe he's blogged about our conversation, too. I think there was a link on his profile. 

Note that this is all information you can find in a Google search and the fact that Twitter is an open forum and therefore, I give no fucks, as is my right to choose, about including his Twitter handle here. He also seems like the kind of guy who figures prostitutes, and probably wives, can't be raped, strippers can't be harassed, and a host of other women hating agendas, because he definitely has no respect for healthy sexual boundaries... Proven by the fact that he believes he should be in charge of what goes into or comes out of my vagina via M-312... we've never even met and he wants to dominate my coochie. People with healthy sexual attitudes simply acknowledge they like BDSM play and invite a bitch to be spanked, they don't have to waste a lot of time and money dragging Parliament into the bedroom. And people think of the BDSM lovers as the perverts???

All that said, regarding M-312, Harper did keep his word and opposed the motion. First time for everything. Woo Hoo for vaginas coast to coast!